On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 3:28 PM Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 02:56:21PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 2:47 PM Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > (Sorry, a few more things jumped out at me when I looked again...) > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 04:18:12PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c > > > > index 72c7639e3c98..25118902a376 100644 > > > > --- a/kernel/sys.c > > > > +++ b/kernel/sys.c > > > > @@ -2299,6 +2299,64 @@ int __weak arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_set(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long which, > > > > > > > > #define PR_IO_FLUSHER (PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO | PF_LOCAL_THROTTLE) > > > > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MMU > > > > + > > > > +#define ANON_VMA_NAME_MAX_LEN 256 > > > > + > > > > +static inline bool is_valid_name_char(char ch) > > > > +{ > > > > + /* printable ascii characters, except [ \ ] */ > > > > + return (ch > 0x1f && ch < 0x5b) || (ch > 0x5d && ch < 0x7f); > > > > +} > > > > > > In the back of my mind, I feel like disallowing backtick would be nice, > > > but then if $, (, and ) are allowed, it doesn't matter, and that seems > > > too limiting. :) > > > > It's not used by the only current user (Android) and we can always > > allow more chars later. However going the other direction and > > disallowing some of them I think would be harder (need to make sure > > nobody uses them). WDYT if we keep it stricter and relax if needed? > > I'd say, if we can also drop each of: ` $ ( ) > then let's do it. Better to keep the obvious shell meta-characters out > of this, although I don't feel strongly about it. Anything that might > get confused by this would be similarly confused by binary names too: > > $ cat /proc/3407216/maps > 560bdafd4000-560bdafd6000 r--p 00000000 fd:02 2621909 /tmp/yay`wat > > And it's probably easier to change a binary name than to call prctl. :P > > I'm good either way. What you have now is great, but if we wanted to be > extra extra strict, we can add the other 4 above. While testing v10 I found one case when () are used in the name "dalvik-main space (region space)". So I can add ` and $ to the restricted set but not ( and ). Kees, would you be happy with: static inline bool is_valid_name_char(char ch) { return ch > 0x1f && ch < 0x7f && !strchr("\\`$[]", ch); } ? > > -- > Kees Cook