On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 09:12:53AM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote: > From: Nadav Amit <namit@xxxxxxxxxx> > > madvise_dontneed_free() is called only from madvise_vma() and the > behavior is always either MADV_FREE or MADV_DONTNEED. There is no need > to check again in madvise_dontneed_free() if the behavior is any > different. So what. The check is free. Compiler should be clever enough to eliminate the additional check. If there's a new MADV_DONTNEED flavour, the change would have to be effectively reverted. NAK. -- Kirill A. Shutemov
