Sorry, the patch forgets to add --prefix PATCH V2, abandon. Review the V2, thx. On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 2:07 PM <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > The __Pxxx/__Sxxx macros are only for protection_map[] init. All > usage of them in linux should come from protection_map array. > > Because a lot of architectures would re-initilize protection_map[] > array, eg: x86-mem_encrypt, m68k-motorola, mips, arm, sparc. > > Using __P000 is not rigorous. > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Changes since V2: > - s/init protection_map[]/protection_map[] init/ > - s/Becasue/Because/ > - Remove unclear part > - Replace __P000 and __S000 with protection_map[0] and > protection_map[8] > --- > mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 7 ++++--- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c > index 1403639302e4..228e3954b90c 100644 > --- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c > +++ b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c > @@ -1104,13 +1104,14 @@ static int __init init_args(struct pgtable_debug_args *args) > /* > * Initialize the debugging data. > * > - * __P000 (or even __S000) will help create page table entries with > - * PROT_NONE permission as required for pxx_protnone_tests(). > + * protection_map[0] (or even protection_map[8]) will help create > + * page table entries with PROT_NONE permission as required for > + * pxx_protnone_tests(). > */ > memset(args, 0, sizeof(*args)); > args->vaddr = get_random_vaddr(); > args->page_prot = vm_get_page_prot(VMFLAGS); > - args->page_prot_none = __P000; > + args->page_prot_none = protection_map[0]; > args->is_contiguous_page = false; > args->pud_pfn = ULONG_MAX; > args->pmd_pfn = ULONG_MAX; > -- > 2.25.1 > -- Best Regards Guo Ren ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/
