Hi,
I confirmed this patch (applied on 5.14) gets rid of the below userfaultfd test failure.
# ./userfaultfd anon 16 2
nr_pages: 4096, nr_pages_per_cpu: 256
bounces: 1, mode: rnd read, userfaults: 313 missing (51+34+37+26+41+28+15+20+16+12+13+7+10+2+0+1) 995 wp (121+79+96+53+90+104+48+61+56+82+56+41+49+26+11+22)
bounces: 0, mode: read, userfaults: 64 missing (15+8+10+6+5+2+4+3+3+1+4+0+0+2+0+1) 2157 wp (223+274+189+141+116+132+203+153+143+126+110+114+101+66+42+24)
testing uffd-wp with pagemap (pgsize=4096): done
testing uffd-wp with pagemap (pgsize=2097152): done
testing UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE: done.
testing signal delivery: done.
testing events (fork, remap, remove): ERROR: nr 3933 memory corruption 0 1
(errno=0, line=963)
ERROR: faulting process failed (errno=0, line=1117)
nr_pages: 4096, nr_pages_per_cpu: 256
bounces: 1, mode: rnd read, userfaults: 313 missing (51+34+37+26+41+28+15+20+16+12+13+7+10+2+0+1) 995 wp (121+79+96+53+90+104+48+61+56+82+56+41+49+26+11+22)
bounces: 0, mode: read, userfaults: 64 missing (15+8+10+6+5+2+4+3+3+1+4+0+0+2+0+1) 2157 wp (223+274+189+141+116+132+203+153+143+126+110+114+101+66+42+24)
testing uffd-wp with pagemap (pgsize=4096): done
testing uffd-wp with pagemap (pgsize=2097152): done
testing UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE: done.
testing signal delivery: done.
testing events (fork, remap, remove): ERROR: nr 3933 memory corruption 0 1
(errno=0, line=963)
ERROR: faulting process failed (errno=0, line=1117)
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 11:34 AM Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Nadav Amit <namit@xxxxxxxxxx>
A race is possible when a process exits, its VMAs are removed
by exit_mmap() and at the same time userfaultfd_writeprotect() is
called.
The race was detected by KASAN on a development kernel, but it appears
to be possible on vanilla kernels as well.
Use mmget_not_zero() to prevent the race as done in other userfaultfd
operations.
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 63b2d4174c4ad ("userfaultfd: wp: add the writeprotect API to userfaultfd ioctl")
Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Li Wang <liwang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/userfaultfd.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
index 003f0d31743e..22bf14ab2d16 100644
--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -1827,9 +1827,15 @@ static int userfaultfd_writeprotect(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
if (mode_wp && mode_dontwake)
return -EINVAL;
- ret = mwriteprotect_range(ctx->mm, uffdio_wp.range.start,
- uffdio_wp.range.len, mode_wp,
- &ctx->mmap_changing);
+ if (mmget_not_zero(ctx->mm)) {
+ ret = mwriteprotect_range(ctx->mm, uffdio_wp.range.start,
+ uffdio_wp.range.len, mode_wp,
+ &ctx->mmap_changing);
+ mmput(ctx->mm);
+ } else {
+ return -ESRCH;
+ }
+
if (ret)
return ret;
--
2.25.1
Regards,
Li Wang