On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 02:23:41PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote: > On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 7:41 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 05:07:03PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote: > > > > The debugging showed the page passed to invalidatepage is a huge page > > > > and the length is the size of huge page instead of single page due to > > > > read only FS THP support. But block_invalidatepage() would throw BUG if > > > > the size is greater than single page. > > > > Things have already gone wrong before we get to this point. See > > do_dentry_open(). You aren't supposed to be able to get a writable file > > descriptor on a file which has had huge pages added to the page cache > > without the filesystem's knowledge. That's the problem that needs to > > be fixed. > > I don't quite understand your point here. Do you mean do_dentry_open() > should fail for such cases instead of truncating the page cache? No, do_dentry_open() should have truncated the page cache when it was called and found that there were THPs in the cache. Then khugepaged should see that someone has the file open for write and decline to create new THPs. So it shouldn't be possible to get here with THPs in the cache.
