Hi, Oliver, kernel test robot <oliver.sang@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Greeting, > > FYI, we noticed a -53.8% regression of stress-ng.memhotplug.ops_per_sec due to commit: > > > commit: 9eeb73028cfb54eb06efe87c50cc014d3f1ff43e ("[patch 174/212] mm/migrate: update node demotion order on hotplug events") > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Andrew-Morton/ia64-fix-typo-in-a-comment/20210903-065028 > > > in testcase: stress-ng > on test machine: 96 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6252 CPU @ 2.10GHz with 192G memory > with following parameters: > > nr_threads: 10% > disk: 1HDD > testtime: 60s > fs: ext4 > class: os > test: memhotplug > cpufreq_governor: performance > ucode: 0x5003006 > Can you help to test whether the following patch can recover the regression? Best Regards, Huang, Ying ----------------------------8<-------------------------------------- >From 5d3e18a9f083954584932a20233ef489d9398342 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 16:51:44 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] mm/migrate: recover hotplug performance regression 0-Day kernel test robot reported a -53.8% performance regression for stress-ng memhotplug test case. This patch is to recover the regression via avoid updating the demotion order if not necessary. Refer: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210905135932.GE15026@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/ Fixes: 884a6e5d1f93 ("mm/migrate: update node demotion order on hotplug events") Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx> Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@xxxxxxxxxx> --- mm/migrate.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c index 77d107a4577f..20d803707497 100644 --- a/mm/migrate.c +++ b/mm/migrate.c @@ -1145,6 +1145,8 @@ static int __unmap_and_move(struct page *page, struct page *newpage, static int node_demotion[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly = {[0 ... MAX_NUMNODES - 1] = NUMA_NO_NODE}; +static bool node_demotion_disabled __read_mostly; + /** * next_demotion_node() - Get the next node in the demotion path * @node: The starting node to lookup the next node @@ -1158,6 +1160,8 @@ int next_demotion_node(int node) { int target; + if (node_demotion_disabled) + return NUMA_NO_NODE; /* * node_demotion[] is updated without excluding this * function from running. RCU doesn't provide any @@ -3198,13 +3202,26 @@ static void __set_migration_target_nodes(void) goto again; } +static int nr_node_has_cpu; +static int nr_node_has_mem; + +static void check_set_migration_target_nodes(void) +{ + if (num_node_state(N_MEMORY) != nr_node_has_mem || + num_node_state(N_CPU) != nr_node_has_cpu) { + __set_migration_target_nodes(); + nr_node_has_mem = num_node_state(N_MEMORY); + nr_node_has_cpu = num_node_state(N_CPU); + } +} + /* * For callers that do not hold get_online_mems() already. */ static void set_migration_target_nodes(void) { get_online_mems(); - __set_migration_target_nodes(); + check_set_migration_target_nodes(); put_online_mems(); } @@ -3249,7 +3266,7 @@ static int __meminit migrate_on_reclaim_callback(struct notifier_block *self, * will leave migration disabled until the offline * completes and the MEM_OFFLINE case below runs. */ - disable_all_migrate_targets(); + node_demotion_disabled = true; break; case MEM_OFFLINE: case MEM_ONLINE: @@ -3257,14 +3274,15 @@ static int __meminit migrate_on_reclaim_callback(struct notifier_block *self, * Recalculate the target nodes once the node * reaches its final state (online or offline). */ - __set_migration_target_nodes(); + check_set_migration_target_nodes(); + node_demotion_disabled = false; break; case MEM_CANCEL_OFFLINE: /* * MEM_GOING_OFFLINE disabled all the migration * targets. Reenable them. */ - __set_migration_target_nodes(); + node_demotion_disabled = false; break; case MEM_GOING_ONLINE: case MEM_CANCEL_ONLINE: -- 2.30.2