On 9/6/21 12:20 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 06.09.21 20:53, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 9/6/21 10:46 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 06.09.21 19:33, Andrew Morton wrote:
(cc's added)
On Sun, 05 Sep 2021 18:05:40 -0700 syzbot <syzbot+aa7a876b8108f1622bc3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: 49624efa65ac Merge tag 'denywrite-for-5.15' of git://githu..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=12eff4b3300000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=c598149362d97396
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=aa7a876b8108f1622bc3
compiler: aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.1
userspace arch: arm64
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+aa7a876b8108f1622bc3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 23s! [syz-executor.1:26449]
Modules linked in:
irq event stamp: 248
hardirqs last enabled at (247): [<ffff8000145ed108>] __exit_to_kernel_mode arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:81 [inline]
hardirqs last enabled at (247): [<ffff8000145ed108>] exit_to_kernel_mode+0x38/0x230 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:91
hardirqs last disabled at (248): [<ffff8000145ed0c0>] enter_el1_irq_or_nmi+0x10/0x20 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:227
softirqs last enabled at (182): [<ffff800010010964>] _stext+0x964/0xff8
softirqs last disabled at (41): [<ffff800010160f58>] do_softirq_own_stack include/asm-generic/softirq_stack.h:10 [inline]
softirqs last disabled at (41): [<ffff800010160f58>] invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:439 [inline]
softirqs last disabled at (41): [<ffff800010160f58>] __irq_exit_rcu+0x208/0x4f0 kernel/softirq.c:636
CPU: 0 PID: 26449 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 5.14.0-syzkaller-09416-g49624efa65ac #0
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
pstate: 00000005 (nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : clear_page+0x14/0x28 arch/arm64/lib/clear_page.S:23
lr : clear_highpage include/linux/highmem.h:181 [inline]
lr : kernel_init_free_pages.part.0+0x6c/0x17c mm/page_alloc.c:1286
sp : ffff800019be75e0
x29: ffff800019be75e0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: 0000000000000000
x26: ffff000009d64940 x25: ffff6000013ac928 x24: 00000000000014c0
x23: ffff000009d63480 x22: fffffc0000173340 x21: ffff800015794a78
x20: dfff800000000000 x19: fffffc0000173300 x18: 0000000000000000
x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000000
x14: 1ffff0000337ce86 x13: 0000000000000013 x12: ffff7f800002e667
x11: 1fffff800002e666 x10: ffff7f800002e666 x9 : 0000000000000000
x8 : ffff600000b99a00 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 000000000000003f
x5 : 0000000000000040 x4 : 1ffff00003060d98 x3 : 1fffe000013ac691
x2 : 0000000000000004 x1 : 0000000000000040 x0 : ffff000005ccc880
Call trace:
clear_page+0x14/0x28 arch/arm64/lib/clear_page.S:21
kernel_init_free_pages mm/page_alloc.c:1283 [inline]
post_alloc_hook+0x1ac/0x25c mm/page_alloc.c:2426
prep_new_page mm/page_alloc.c:2436 [inline]
get_page_from_freelist+0x184c/0x2320 mm/page_alloc.c:4168
__alloc_pages+0x1a8/0x21d0 mm/page_alloc.c:5390
alloc_pages_vma+0xbc/0x530 mm/mempolicy.c:2252
alloc_zeroed_user_highpage_movable+0x9c/0xd0 arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:926
do_anonymous_page mm/memory.c:3767 [inline]
handle_pte_fault mm/memory.c:4556 [inline]
__handle_mm_fault+0xbc4/0x2210 mm/memory.c:4693
handle_mm_fault+0x1dc/0x4f0 mm/memory.c:4791
__do_page_fault arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:499 [inline]
do_page_fault+0x230/0x8c0 arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:599
do_translation_fault+0x1a4/0x210 arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:680
do_mem_abort+0x64/0x1c0 arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:813
el0_da+0x7c/0x2b0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:481
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x168/0x1b0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:616
el0t_64_sync+0x1a0/0x1a4 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:572
At first sight, looks unrelated. Being stuck in clear_page() is weird; we're running inside a VM ("dummy-virt"), whereby such stuck tasks in the guests are sometimes the result of the hypervisor being stuck (e.g., heavily overcommitted).
Unrelated to your series, yes, because it was first reported after commit ebf435d3b51b
("Merge tag 'staging-5.15-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging")
which predates your series.
If we don't get a reproducer, that's most probably the root cause. Let's see.
That seems unlikely. The problem was seen 8 times by now, starting September 2.
.. always in a similar setup? (even the same hypervisor involved ?)
I've seen these exact symptoms
a) when the hypervisor was heavily overcommitting
b) the hypervisor was using uffd (e.g., for psotcopy live migration) and not properly resolving faults in user space for the VM process
It would happen when the VM would first access some yet unpopulated page in the hypervisor.
But obviously, could be something else, especially once we spot it on real HW. But it smells like the VM is slow.
I can spot: https://groups.google.com/g/syzkaller-bugs/c/l6RsKu3FhT0/m/7we3AMNxAAAJ
"This is also due to arm64 removal of CMDLINE support.
syzbot sets watchdog_thresh=165, but this fired after 22s. "
and there, it was also "dummy-virt" ... so maybe really a slow/overloaded hypervisor.
Ah yes, obviously that error is not new. I stand corrected.
Thanks,
Guenter
