On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:40:16 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 16:37 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > > + /* TODO : Analysis and verification of instruction > > */ > > As in refuse to set a breakpoint on an instruction we can't deal with? > > Do we care? The worst case we'll crash the program, but if we're > allowed setting uprobes we already have enough privileges to do that > anyway, right? > I think we should and we do care. That's already implemented in the subsequent patches too. For example: we don't a trace breakpoint instruction. -- Thanks and Regards Srikar -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>