On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 12:03 AM Rolf Eike Beer <eb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Am Freitag, 27. August 2021, 21:18:58 CEST schrieb Suren Baghdasaryan: > > While forking a process with high number (64K) of named anonymous vmas the > > overhead caused by strdup() is noticeable. Experiments with ARM64 Android > > device show up to 40% performance regression when forking a process with > > 64k unpopulated anonymous vmas using the max name lengths vs the same > > process with the same number of anonymous vmas having no name. > > Introduce anon_vma_name refcounted structure to avoid the overhead of > > copying vma names during fork() and when splitting named anonymous vmas. > > When a vma is duplicated, instead of copying the name we increment the > > refcount of this structure. Multiple vmas can point to the same > > anon_vma_name as long as they increment the refcount. The name member of > > anon_vma_name structure is assigned at structure allocation time and is > > never changed. If vma name changes then the refcount of the original > > structure is dropped, a new anon_vma_name structure is allocated > > to hold the new name and the vma pointer is updated to point to the new > > structure. > > With this approach the fork() performance regressions is reduced 3-4x > > times and with usecases using more reasonable number of VMAs (a few > > thousand) the regressions is not measurable. > > > > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > include/linux/mm_types.h | 9 ++++++++- > > mm/madvise.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > > 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c > > index bc029f3fca6a..32ac5dc5ebf3 100644 > > --- a/mm/madvise.c > > +++ b/mm/madvise.c > > @@ -63,6 +63,27 @@ static int madvise_need_mmap_write(int behavior) > > } > > } > > > > +static struct anon_vma_name *anon_vma_name_alloc(const char *name) > > +{ > > + struct anon_vma_name *anon_name; > > + size_t len = strlen(name); > > + > > + /* Add 1 for NUL terminator at the end of the anon_name->name */ > > + anon_name = kzalloc(sizeof(*anon_name) + len + 1, > > + GFP_KERNEL); > > + kref_init(&anon_name->kref); > > + strcpy(anon_name->name, name); > > + > > + return anon_name; > > +} > > Given that you overwrite anything in that struct anyway this could be reduced > to kmalloc(), no? And it definitely needs a NULL check. Ack. I'll address both points in the next revision. Thanks! Suren. > > Eike > -- > Rolf Eike Beer, emlix GmbH, http://www.emlix.com > Fon +49 551 30664-0, Fax +49 551 30664-11 > Gothaer Platz 3, 37083 Göttingen, Germany > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Göttingen, Amtsgericht Göttingen HR B 3160 > Geschäftsführung: Heike Jordan, Dr. Uwe Kracke – Ust-IdNr.: DE 205 198 055 > > emlix - smart embedded open source