On 30/08/2021 15:32, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 09:04:41AM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote: >> + if (!pte_devmap(pte) && pte_special(pte) && >> + !is_zero_pfn(pte_pfn(pte))) { > Maybe this is a little too superficial and nitpicky, but I find the > ordering of the checks a little strange. Why not do the pte_special > first and then the exlusions from it later? > It sounds good to me, let's update it Thanks Zhijian