On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 10:16:18AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 08:43:40AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > Fine with me; although the immediate complaint from Andrew was about
> > size, hence my UD1 hackery.
> >
> > > So if we do this, I think it should be something like
> > >
> > > static inline __must_check bool refcount_dec_and_test(refcount_t *r)
> > > {
> > > asm_volatile_goto (LOCK_PREFIX "decl %[var]\n\t"
> > > "jz %l[cc_zero]\n\t"
> > > "jl %l[cc_error]"
> > > : : [var] "m" (r->refs.counter)
> > > : "memory" : cc_zero, cc_error);
> > >
> > > return false;
> > >
> > > cc_zero:
> > > return true;
> > > cc_error:
> > > refcount_warn_saturate(r, REFCOUNT_SUB_UAF);
> > > return false;
> > > }
> > >
> > > and we can discuss whether we could improve on the
> > > refcount_warn_saturate() separately.
> >
> > I can do the refcount_warn_saturate() change separately.
> >
> > Let me go check how small I can get it...
>
> gcc-10.2.1, x86_64-defconfig
>
> kernel/event/core.o-inline-ud1: 96454
> kernel/event/core.o-outofline-ud1: 96604
> kernel/event/core.o-outofline-call: 97072
>
> (42 refcount_warn_saturate/ud1 instances in that file,
> 10 of which are refcount_dec_and_test)
Is that with the saturation moved to the UD handler as well? I think it
would be good to keep that as close to the point at which we detect the
problem as we can, so perhaps we can inline that part and leave the
diagnostics to the exception handler?
Will
