Re: [PATCH v1] mm/hwpoison: Retry with shake_page() for unhandlable pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 11:07:43AM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 10:37 PM Naoya Horiguchi
> <naoya.horiguchi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > HWPoisonHandlable() sometimes returns false for typical user pages
> > due to races with average memory events like transfers over LRU lists.
> > This causes failures in hwpoison handling.
> >
> > There's retry code for such a case but does not work because the retry
> > loop reaches the retry limit too quickly before the page settles down to
> > handlable state. Let get_any_page() call shake_page() to fix it.
> >
> > Fixes: 25182f05ffed ("mm,hwpoison: fix race with hugetlb page allocation")
> > Reported-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 5.13
> > ---
> >  mm/memory-failure.c | 11 ++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git v5.14-rc6/mm/memory-failure.c v5.14-rc6_patched/mm/memory-failure.c
> > index eefd823deb67..aa6592540f17 100644
> > --- v5.14-rc6/mm/memory-failure.c
> > +++ v5.14-rc6_patched/mm/memory-failure.c
> > @@ -1146,7 +1146,7 @@ static int __get_hwpoison_page(struct page *page)
> >          * unexpected races caused by taking a page refcount.
> >          */
> >         if (!HWPoisonHandlable(head))
> > -               return 0;
> > +               return -EBUSY;
> >
> >         if (PageTransHuge(head)) {
> >                 /*
> > @@ -1199,9 +1199,14 @@ static int get_any_page(struct page *p, unsigned long flags)
> >                         }
> >                         goto out;
> >                 } else if (ret == -EBUSY) {
> > -                       /* We raced with freeing huge page to buddy, retry. */
> > -                       if (pass++ < 3)
> > +                       /*
> > +                        * We raced with (possibly temporary) unhandlable
> > +                        * page, retry.
> > +                        */
> > +                       if (pass++ < 3) {
> > +                               shake_page(p, 1);
> >                                 goto try_again;
> > +                       }
> 
> I think the return value should be set to -EIO before jumping to out.
> I'm supposed -EIO means this is really or very likely an unhandlable
> page.

You're right, I have the same assumption that -EBUSY means transient error
and -EIO means permanent one. And we consider an error as permanent when the
retry limit is reached. I'll update the patch. Thank you for the comment.

- Naoya Horiguchi




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux