On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2011, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
>>
>> static void flush_all(struct kmem_cache *s)
>> {
>> - on_each_cpu(flush_cpu_slab, s, 1);
>> + cpumask_var_t cpus;
>> + struct kmem_cache_cpu *c;
>> + int cpu;
>> +
>> + if (likely(zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpus, GFP_ATOMIC))) {
>
> __GFP_NOWARN too maybe?
>
>> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
>> + c = per_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab, cpu);
>> + if (c->page)
>> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpus);
>> + }
>> + on_each_cpu_mask(cpus, flush_cpu_slab, s, 1);
>> + free_cpumask_var(cpus);
>> + } else
>> + on_each_cpu(flush_cpu_slab, s, 1);
>> }
>
> Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I can't take the patch because it depends on a new API introduced in the
> first patch.
>
> I'm CC'ing Andrew.
...this time with the right email address.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href