We've got the expected count for anonymous page or file page by expected_page_refs() at the beginning of migrate_page_move_mapping(), thus we should move the page count validation a little forward to reduce duplicated code. Moreover the i_pages lock is not used to guarantee the page refcount safety in migrate_page_move_mapping(), so we can move the getting page count out of the i_pages lock. Since now the migration page has established a migration pte under the page lock now, with the page refcount freezing validation, to ensure that the page references meet the migration requirement. Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- mm/migrate.c | 10 ++++------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c index c6eb2a8..8e9282f 100644 --- a/mm/migrate.c +++ b/mm/migrate.c @@ -386,11 +386,10 @@ int folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping, int expected_count = expected_page_refs(mapping, &folio->page) + extra_count; long nr = folio_nr_pages(folio); - if (!mapping) { - /* Anonymous page without mapping */ - if (folio_ref_count(folio) != expected_count) - return -EAGAIN; + if (folio_ref_count(folio) != expected_count) + return -EAGAIN; + if (!mapping) { /* No turning back from here */ newfolio->index = folio->index; newfolio->mapping = folio->mapping; @@ -404,8 +403,7 @@ int folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping, newzone = folio_zone(newfolio); xas_lock_irq(&xas); - if (folio_ref_count(folio) != expected_count || - xas_load(&xas) != folio) { + if (xas_load(&xas) != folio) { xas_unlock_irq(&xas); return -EAGAIN; } -- 1.8.3.1