On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 12:54:05PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > -static int __mem_cgroup_charge(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *memcg, > > +static int __mem_cgroup_charge(struct folio *folio, struct mem_cgroup *memcg, > > gfp_t gfp) > > The git/next version also renames this function to charge_memcg(), why? The new > name doesn't look that internal as the old one. I don't have a strong opinion > but CCing memcg maintainers who might. Ah, this is Suren's fault :-) https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210710003626.3549282-2-surenb@xxxxxxxxxx/ Renaming it here makes the merge resolution cleaner.
