Re: [PATCH 06/18] ARC: mm: Enable STRICT_MM_TYPECHECKS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/11/21 5:04 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 05:42:46PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
In the past I've refrained from doing this (atleast 2 times) due to the
                                             ^ at least

slight code bloat due to ABI implications of pte_t etc becoming sttuct
                                                                  ^ struct
Per ARC ABI, functions return struct via memory and not through register
r0, even if the struct would fits in register(s)
                               ^ fit

Fixed.

  - caller allocates space on stack and passes the address as first arg
    (r0), shifting rest of args by one

  - callee creates return struct in memory (referenced via r0)

This time around the code actually shrunk slightly (due to subtle
inlining heuristic effects), but still slightly inefficient due to
return values passed through memory. That however seems like a small
Out of curiosity, is this actually measurable on real world applications?

Not really, but they look hideous to an objdump hunkie like me (who treats waste of electrons like wasting food) and wondering what piece of art your compiler is spitting out ;-) only to realize that is source code induced.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux