On 2011.11.21 at 08:44 +0800, Alex,Shi wrote: > On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 20:02 +0800, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > > On 2011.11.18 at 09:54 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > > > On 2011.11.18 at 16:43 +0800, Alex,Shi wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The dirty flag comes from a bunch of unrelated xfs patches from Christoph, that > > > > > > I'm testing right now. > > > > > > > > Where is the xfs patchset? I am wondering if it is due to slub code. > > > > I begin to wonder if this might be the result of a compiler bug. > > The kernel in question was compiled with gcc version 4.7.0 20111117. And > > there was commit to the gcc repository today that looks suspicious: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=181466 > > > > Tell us if it is still there and you can reproduce it. The issue wasn't easily reproducible in the first place. I will build my kernels with a more stable gcc version for the next days and see if I can still reproduce the problem. (It didn't show up in the last few days of testing). -- Markus -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>