Hi Matthew, On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 03:55:44 +0100 Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I think conceptually, the folio for-next tree is part of mmotm for this > cycle. I would have asked Andrew to carry these patches, but there are > people (eg Dave Howells) who want to develop against them. And that's > hard to do with patches that are in mmotm. > > So if Andrew bases mmotm on the folio tree for this cycle, does that > make sense? Sure. I will have a little pain the first day it appears, but it should be OK after that. I am on leave starting Saturday, so if you could get me a tree without the mmotm patches for tomorrow that would be good. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpMvQVR5r5i_.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
