On 7/19/21 5:26 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > At the risk of asking a potentially silly question, would it be > reasonable to treat non-validated memory as not-present for kernel > purposes and hot-add it in a thread as it gets validated? Or would this > result in poor system behavior before enough memory is validated? > Perhaps we should block instead of failing allocations if we want more > memory than is currently validated? It can't be _that_ big of a problem since we already have DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT causing the same kind of issue.
