On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 09:44:53PM +0200, Michal Such?nek wrote: > > > Well, luckily it seems we anticipated issues like that and added > > > --skip_encoding_btf_vars argument, which I completely forgot about and > > > just accidentally came across reviewing Arnaldo's latest pahole patch. > > > I think that one is a much better solution, as then it will impact > > > only those that explicitly relies on availability of BTF for per-CPU > > > variables, which is a subset of all possible uses for kernel BTF. Sent > > > a patch ([0]), please take a look. > > > > > > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210530002536.3193829-1-andrii@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u > > > > I'm happy to have this patch used as an alternative to forcing 1.22 to > > be the minimum version of pahole required. > > Is pahole 1.22 available already? > Ultimately it was of less importance because of a0b8200d06ad ("kbuild: skip per-CPU BTF generation for pahole v1.18-v1.21"). As I write this, pahole v1.22 has not been tagged. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs
