On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:21 PM, John Kacur <jkacur@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 3:16 PM, John Kacur <jkacur@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> In the error path that we fail to allocate new huge page, before try again, we
>>> have to check race since page_table_lock is re-acquired.
>>>
>>> If racing, our job is done.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c Fri Nov 18 21:38:30 2011
>>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c Fri Nov 18 21:48:15 2011
>>> @@ -2407,7 +2407,14 @@ retry_avoidcopy:
>>> BUG_ON(page_count(old_page) != 1);
>>> BUG_ON(huge_pte_none(pte));
>>> spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock);
>>> - goto retry_avoidcopy;
>>> + ptep = huge_pte_offset(mm, address & huge_page_mask(h));
>>> + if (likely(pte_same(huge_ptep_get(ptep), pte)))
>>> + goto retry_avoidcopy;
>>> + /*
>>> + * race occurs while re-acquiring page_table_lock, and
>>> + * our job is done.
>>> + */
>>> + return 0;
>>> }
>>> WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
>>> }
>>
>>
>> I'm not sure about the veracity of the race condition, but you better
>> do spin_unlock before you return.
>>
>
> Ugh, sorry for the noise, I see that's not how it works here.
Welcome:)
��.n������g��� �a��� �&ޖ)���)��h���&������梷���� �Ǟ�m������)�����b�n���y��{^�w�r���&�i��('����춊m�鞵��â����چ�����i�������$����