On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 01:05:24AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> mm/hugetlb.c:4334:6: warning: symbol '__unmap_hugepage_range' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> hugetlb.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 924553aa8f789ad..4bdd637b0c29a95 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -4331,9 +4331,9 @@ int copy_hugetlb_page_range(struct mm_struct *dst, struct mm_struct *src,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> - unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> - struct page *ref_page)
> +static void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> + struct page *ref_page)
> {
> struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
> unsigned long address;
Will squash this change into the patch. Thanks.
--
Peter Xu
