Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm/vmscan: fix misleading comment in isolate_lru_pages()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2021/7/13 17:32, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 12-07-21 19:16:47, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>> On 2021/7/12 15:28, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Sat 10-07-21 18:03:29, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>>>> We couldn't know whether the page is being freed elsewhere until we failed
>>>> to increase the page count.
>>>
>>> This is moving a hard to understand comment from one place to another.
>>
>> If get_page_unless_zero failed, the page could have been freed elsewhere. I think
>> this looks straightforward but doesn't help a lot. Are you preferring to just
>> remove this comment ?
> 
> Yes the comment in its current form is not really helpful much. Does it
> deserve a single liner to drop it? Likely not on its own without more
> changes in that area.

Sure, I will drop this single patch. And I would send a new patch when I collect enough
misleading/obsolete comments to fix.

Thanks.

> 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux