Rename domain_update_bandwidth() to domain_update_dirty_limit(). The
original name is a misnomer. The function has nothing to do with a
bandwidth, it updates dirty limits.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
---
mm/page-writeback.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index 6a99ddca95c0..95abae9eecaf 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -1153,8 +1153,8 @@ static void update_dirty_limit(struct dirty_throttle_control *dtc)
dom->dirty_limit = limit;
}
-static void domain_update_bandwidth(struct dirty_throttle_control *dtc,
- unsigned long now)
+static void domain_update_dirty_limit(struct dirty_throttle_control *dtc,
+ unsigned long now)
{
struct wb_domain *dom = dtc_dom(dtc);
@@ -1351,7 +1351,7 @@ static void __wb_update_bandwidth(struct dirty_throttle_control *gdtc,
written = percpu_counter_read(&wb->stat[WB_WRITTEN]);
if (update_ratelimit) {
- domain_update_bandwidth(gdtc, now);
+ domain_update_dirty_limit(gdtc, now);
wb_update_dirty_ratelimit(gdtc, dirtied, elapsed);
/*
@@ -1359,7 +1359,7 @@ static void __wb_update_bandwidth(struct dirty_throttle_control *gdtc,
* compiler has no way to figure that out. Help it.
*/
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK) && mdtc) {
- domain_update_bandwidth(mdtc, now);
+ domain_update_dirty_limit(mdtc, now);
wb_update_dirty_ratelimit(mdtc, dirtied, elapsed);
}
}
--
2.26.2
