On Wed, 19 May 2021 23:07:50 +0200 Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Basically a single-page allocator is more permissive so it is a higher > > chance to success. Therefore a fallback to it makes sense. > > > Hello, Christoph. > > See below the patch. Does it sound good for you? It is about moving > page allocation part into separate function: Please just send over a patch which addresses this and Christoph's other review comments. I don't think the discussion with Mel against this patch identified any needed changes, so I'll send this series to Linus.
