Zi Yan <ziy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 18 Jun 2021, at 2:15, Huang Ying wrote:
>
>> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Anonymous pages are kept on their own LRU(s). These lists could
>> theoretically always be scanned and maintained. But, without swap,
>> there is currently nothing the kernel can *do* with the results of a
>> scanned, sorted LRU for anonymous pages.
>>
>> A check for '!total_swap_pages' currently serves as a valid check as
>> to whether anonymous LRUs should be maintained. However, another
>> method will be added shortly: page demotion.
>>
>> Abstract out the 'total_swap_pages' checks into a helper, give it a
>> logically significant name, and check for the possibility of page
>> demotion.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: osalvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> mm/vmscan.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
>> index 7d5c7216a4b7..8654cec65522 100644
>> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
>> @@ -2706,6 +2706,26 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Anonymous LRU management is a waste if there is
>> + * ultimately no way to reclaim the memory.
>> + */
>> +bool anon_should_be_aged(struct lruvec *lruvec)
>> +{
>> + struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
>> +
>> + /* Aging the anon LRU is valuable if swap is present: */
>> + if (total_swap_pages > 0)
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + /* Also valuable if anon pages can be demoted: */
>> + if (next_demotion_node(pgdat->node_id) >= 0)
>
> != NUMA_NO_NODE might be better, even though we know NUMA_NO_NODE
> is currently set to -1.
Sure. Will change this in the next version.
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + /* No way to reclaim anon pages. Should not age anon LRUs: */
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
>> {
>> unsigned long nr[NR_LRU_LISTS];
>> @@ -2815,7 +2835,8 @@ static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
>> * Even if we did not try to evict anon pages at all, we want to
>> * rebalance the anon lru active/inactive ratio.
>> */
>> - if (total_swap_pages && inactive_is_low(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON))
>> + if (anon_should_be_aged(lruvec) &&
>> + inactive_is_low(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON))
>> shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, lruvec,
>> sc, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON);
>> }
>> @@ -3644,10 +3665,11 @@ static void age_active_anon(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
>> struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
>> struct lruvec *lruvec;
>>
>> - if (!total_swap_pages)
>> + lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(NULL, pgdat);
>> +
>> + if (!anon_should_be_aged(lruvec))
>> return;
>>
>> - lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(NULL, pgdat);
>> if (!inactive_is_low(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON))
>> return;
>>
>> --
>> 2.30.2
>
>
> —
> Best Regards,
> Yan, Zi
