On 18/06/2021 16:52, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 04:21:45PM +0200, kernel test robot wrote: >> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master >> head: e71e3a48a7e89fa71fb70bf4602367528864d2ff >> commit: 56ebc9b0d77e0406aba2d900c82e79204cc7dc32 [5946/11253] memory: tegra: Enable compile testing for all drivers >> config: x86_64-randconfig-a001-20210618 (attached as .config) >> compiler: clang version 13.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 64720f57bea6a6bf033feef4a5751ab9c0c3b401) >> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): >> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross >> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross >> # install x86_64 cross compiling tool for clang build >> # apt-get install binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu >> # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=56ebc9b0d77e0406aba2d900c82e79204cc7dc32 >> git remote add linux-next https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git >> git fetch --no-tags linux-next master >> git checkout 56ebc9b0d77e0406aba2d900c82e79204cc7dc32 >> # save the attached .config to linux build tree >> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=x86_64 >> >> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate >> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> Note: the linux-next/master HEAD e71e3a48a7e89fa71fb70bf4602367528864d2ff builds fine. >> It may have been fixed somewhere. >> >> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> >>>> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: reset_controller_register >> >>> referenced by mc.c >> >>> memory/tegra/mc.o:(tegra_mc_probe) in archive drivers/built-in.a > > Ugh... more fallout from that compile-test enablement. It looks like > that compile-test stubs addition patch for reset hasn't found its way > into linux-next yet. Does it mean reset tree is not in linux-next? > Philipp, I wonder if it would make sense for Krzysztof to pick up that > patch or, if you prefer, for Krzysztof to pull a stable branch from you > that includes this so that the memory controller tree becomes buildable > again? These are randconfigs, so I don't think Linus will hit them when merging. Therefore assuming the reset-stubs are applied (and tree is in next), we should be fine, shouldn't we? Best regards, Krzysztof