Re: [linux-next:master 5946/11253] ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: reset_controller_register

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 18/06/2021 16:52, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 04:21:45PM +0200, kernel test robot wrote:
>> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
>> head:   e71e3a48a7e89fa71fb70bf4602367528864d2ff
>> commit: 56ebc9b0d77e0406aba2d900c82e79204cc7dc32 [5946/11253] memory: tegra: Enable compile testing for all drivers
>> config: x86_64-randconfig-a001-20210618 (attached as .config)
>> compiler: clang version 13.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 64720f57bea6a6bf033feef4a5751ab9c0c3b401)
>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>>         # install x86_64 cross compiling tool for clang build
>>         # apt-get install binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu
>>         # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=56ebc9b0d77e0406aba2d900c82e79204cc7dc32
>>         git remote add linux-next https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
>>         git fetch --no-tags linux-next master
>>         git checkout 56ebc9b0d77e0406aba2d900c82e79204cc7dc32
>>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>>         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=x86_64 
>>
>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Note: the linux-next/master HEAD e71e3a48a7e89fa71fb70bf4602367528864d2ff builds fine.
>>       It may have been fixed somewhere.
>>
>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>>>> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: reset_controller_register
>>    >>> referenced by mc.c
>>    >>>               memory/tegra/mc.o:(tegra_mc_probe) in archive drivers/built-in.a
> 
> Ugh... more fallout from that compile-test enablement. It looks like
> that compile-test stubs addition patch for reset hasn't found its way
> into linux-next yet.

Does it mean reset tree is not in linux-next?

> Philipp, I wonder if it would make sense for Krzysztof to pick up that
> patch or, if you prefer, for Krzysztof to pull a stable branch from you
> that includes this so that the memory controller tree becomes buildable
> again?

These are randconfigs, so I don't think Linus will hit them when
merging. Therefore assuming the reset-stubs are applied (and tree is in
next), we should be fine, shouldn't we?

Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux