Re: [PATCH 07/14] xfs: Refactor xfs_isilocked()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 10:53:04AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 16-06-21 06:37:12, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 11:17:57AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > From: Pavel Reichl <preichl@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Refactor xfs_isilocked() to use newly introduced __xfs_rwsem_islocked().
> > > __xfs_rwsem_islocked() is a helper function which encapsulates checking
> > > state of rw_semaphores hold by inode.
> > 
> > __xfs_rwsem_islocked doesn't seem to actually existing in any tree I
> > checked yet?
> 
> __xfs_rwsem_islocked is introduced by this patch so I'm not sure what are
> you asking about... :)

The sentence structure implies that __xfs_rwsem_islocked was previously
introduced.  You might change the commit message to read:

"Introduce a new __xfs_rwsem_islocked predicate to encapsulate checking
the state of a rw_semaphore, then refactor xfs_isilocked to use it."

Since it's not quite a straight copy-paste of the old code.

--D

> 
> 								Honza
> 
> -- 
> Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
> SUSE Labs, CR




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux