Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan.c: fix potential deadlock in reclaim_pages()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 13:47:27 -0600 Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Use memalloc_noreclaim_save()/memalloc_noreclaim_restore() in
> reclaim_pages() to prevent the page reclaim from going into the block
> I/O layer recursively and deadlock.

Well.  Deadlocking the kernel is considered a bad thing ;)

>From the lack of a cc:stable I'm assuming that this is a theoretical
from-code-inspection thing and that such a deadlock has not been
observed?

If not, why do we think that is the case?  What is saving us?

(In other words, more detailed changelogging, please!)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux