On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 11:21 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri 04-06-21 13:35:13, Yang Shi wrote:
> > When trying to migrate pages to obey mempolicy, the huge zero page is
> > split then the page table walk at PTE level just skips zero page. So it
> > seems pointless to split huge zero page, it could be just skipped like
> > base zero page.
>
> My THP knowledge is not the best but this is incorrect AIACS. Huge zero
> page is not split. We do split the pmd which is mapping the said page. I
> suspect you refer to vm_normal_page when talking about a zero page but
> please be aware that huge zero page is not a normal zero page. It is
> allocated dynamically (see get_huge_zero_page).
For a normal huge page, yes, split_huge_pmd() just splits pmd. But
actually the base zero pfn will be inserted to PTEs when splitting
huge zero pmd. Please check __split_huge_zero_page_pmd() out.
I should make this point clearer in the commit log. Sorry for the confusion.
>
> So in the end you patch disables mbind of zero pages to a target node
> and that is a regression.
Do we really migrate zero page? IIUC zero page is just skipped by
vm_normal_page() check in queue_pages_pte_range(), isn't it?
>
> Have you tested the patch?
No, just build test. I thought this change was straightforward.
>
> > Set ACTION_CONTINUE to prevent the walk_page_range() split the pmd for
> > this case.
>
> Btw. this changelog is missing a problem statement. I suspect there is
> no actual problem that it should fix and it is likely driven by reading
> the code. Right?
The actual problem is it is pointless to split a huge zero pmd. Yes,
it is driven by visual inspection.
The behavior before the patch for huge zero page is:
split huge zero pmd (insert base zero pfn to ptes)
walk ptes
skip zero pfn
So why not just skip the huge zero page in the first place?
>
> > Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > mm/mempolicy.c | 9 +++++----
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> > index b5f4f584009b..205c1a768775 100644
> > --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> > +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> > @@ -436,7 +436,8 @@ static inline bool queue_pages_required(struct page *page,
> >
> > /*
> > * queue_pages_pmd() has four possible return values:
> > - * 0 - pages are placed on the right node or queued successfully.
> > + * 0 - pages are placed on the right node or queued successfully, or
> > + * special page is met, i.e. huge zero page.
> > * 1 - there is unmovable page, and MPOL_MF_MOVE* & MPOL_MF_STRICT were
> > * specified.
> > * 2 - THP was split.
> > @@ -460,8 +461,7 @@ static int queue_pages_pmd(pmd_t *pmd, spinlock_t *ptl, unsigned long addr,
> > page = pmd_page(*pmd);
> > if (is_huge_zero_page(page)) {
> > spin_unlock(ptl);
> > - __split_huge_pmd(walk->vma, pmd, addr, false, NULL);
> > - ret = 2;
> > + walk->action = ACTION_CONTINUE;
> > goto out;
> > }
> > if (!queue_pages_required(page, qp))
> > @@ -488,7 +488,8 @@ static int queue_pages_pmd(pmd_t *pmd, spinlock_t *ptl, unsigned long addr,
> > * and move them to the pagelist if they do.
> > *
> > * queue_pages_pte_range() has three possible return values:
> > - * 0 - pages are placed on the right node or queued successfully.
> > + * 0 - pages are placed on the right node or queued successfully, or
> > + * special page is met, i.e. zero page.
> > * 1 - there is unmovable page, and MPOL_MF_MOVE* & MPOL_MF_STRICT were
> > * specified.
> > * -EIO - only MPOL_MF_STRICT was specified and an existing page was already
> > --
> > 2.26.2
>
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
