On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 12:59:50AM +0200, Matteo Croce wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 9:08 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 08:33:45PM +0200, Matteo Croce wrote:
> > > @@ -130,7 +137,10 @@ struct page {
> > > };
> > > };
> > > struct { /* Tail pages of compound page */
> > > - unsigned long compound_head; /* Bit zero is set */
> > > + /* Bit zero is set
> > > + * Bit one if pfmemalloc page
> > > + */
> > > + unsigned long compound_head;
> >
> > I would drop this hunk. Bit 1 is not used for this purpose in tail
> > pages; it's used for that purpose in head and base pages.
> >
> > I suppose we could do something like ...
> >
> > static inline void set_page_pfmemalloc(struct page *page)
> > {
> > - page->index = -1UL;
> > + page->lru.next = (void *)2;
> > }
> >
> > if it's causing confusion.
> >
>
> If you prefer, ok for me.
> Why not "(void *)BIT(1)"? Just to remark that it's a single bit and
> not a magic like value?
I don't have a strong preference. I'd use '2', but I wouldn't ask
BIT(1) to be changed.
