On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: > > I think if it is up to me, I recommend going the simpler route that > > does the allocation in flush_all using GFP_ATOMIC for > > CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y and sends an IPI to all CPUs if it fails, because > > it is simpler code and in the end I believe it is also correct. On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 03:52 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > I support that. Pekka? Sure. I'm OK with that. Someone needs to run some tests to make sure it's working with low memory conditions when GFP_ATOMIC allocations fail, though. Pekka -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>