On Tue, 1 Jun 2021 10:40:09 +0200 David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thanks, i explained the reason during my last reply. > > Andrew has already picked this patch to -mm tree. > > Just because it's in Andrews tree doesn't mean it will end up upstream. ;) > > Anyhow, no really strong opinion, it's simply unnecessary code churn > that makes bisecting harder without real value IMHO. I think it's a good change - mem_sections refers to multiple instances of a mem_section. Churn is a pain, but that's the price we pay for more readable code. And for having screwed it up originally ;)
