On 5/31/21 7:48 PM, Mina Almasry wrote: > On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 5:36 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, 31 May 2021 17:11:52 -0700 Mina Almasry <almasrymina@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 4:25 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On Thu, 27 May 2021 17:50:29 -0700 Mina Almasry <almasrymina@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> I've sent 2 similar patches to the list: >>> >>> 1. "[PATCH v4] mm, hugetlb: Fix simple resv_huge_pages underflow on UFFDIO_COPY" >>> >>> This one is sent to -stable and linux-mm and is a fairly simple fix. >>> >>> 2. "[PATCH v4] mm, hugetlb: fix racy resv_huge_pages underflow on UFFDIO_COPY" >> >> Ah, OK, the title of the first patch was changed, which threw me off. >> >> I'd skipped "[PATCH v4] mm, hugetlb: Fix simple resv_huge_pages >> underflow on UFFDIO_COPY" because Mike's comments appeared to require a >> v5. I applied it and made Mike's changelog suggestions. Queued for >> 5.13 and -stable. >> >> And I queued "[PATCH v4] mm, hugetlb: fix racy resv_huge_pages >> underflow on UFFDIO_COPY" for 5.14. >> >> > > Awesome, thanks! And sorry for the confusion! > Mina, does this patch depend on changes to restore_reserve_on_error()? I am still working on those changes. It may be a few days before I can have something finalized. If this does depend on restore_reserve_on_error as I suspect, perhaps we should send these together. -- Mike Kravetz
