On 5/26/21 5:06 PM, Faiyaz Mohammed wrote: >> How about simply replicating the empty function in >> include/linux/slab_def.h >> > Yes, we can add empty function in include/linux/slab_def.h. > I will add in next patch version. > >> We could do the same with SYSFS, except the SLAB (and SLUB w/o SYSFS) versions >> of sysfs_slab_release() would not be empty, but just call >> slab_kmem_cache_release(s); >> Then we could get rid of the #ifdef's completely? >> > Is it okay, if I raise separate patch for sysfs by adding empty function > in slab_def.h? Yeah that would be cleaner. Thanks. > Thanks and regards, > Mohammed Faiyaz >>> greg k-h >>> >> >
