On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 07:06:56PM +0100, Michal Nazarewicz wrote: > >page_isolation.c may also be a better fit than page_alloc.c > > Since isolate_freepages_block() is the only user of split_free_page(), > would it make sense to move split_free_page() to page_isolation.c as > well? I sort of like the idea of making it static and removing from > header file. > I see no problem with that. It'll be separate from split_page() but that is not earth shattering. Thanks. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>