Re: [PATCH 2/5] mm/sparse: free section usage memory in case populate_section_memmap failed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17.05.21 13:20, Dong Aisheng wrote:
Free section usage memory in case populate_section_memmap failed.
We use map_count to track the remain unused memory to be freed.

Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx>
---
  mm/sparse.c | 2 ++
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
index 7ac481353b6b..98bfacc763da 100644
--- a/mm/sparse.c
+++ b/mm/sparse.c
@@ -549,12 +549,14 @@ static void __init sparse_init_nid(int nid, unsigned long pnum_begin,
  			       __func__, nid);
  			pnum_begin = pnum;
  			sparse_buffer_fini();
+			memblock_free_early(__pa(usage), map_count * mem_section_usage_size());
  			goto failed;
  		}
  		check_usemap_section_nr(nid, usage);
  		sparse_init_one_section(__nr_to_section(pnum), pnum, map, usage,
  				SECTION_IS_EARLY);
  		usage = (void *) usage + mem_section_usage_size();
+		map_count--;
  	}
  	sparse_buffer_fini();
  	return;


Why care about optimizing something that literally never fails, and if it would fail, leave the system in a sub-optimal, mostly unusable state?

--
Thanks,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux