On 5/21/21 3:28 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> +static int nr_pcp_high(struct per_cpu_pages *pcp, struct zone *zone)
> +{
> + int high = READ_ONCE(pcp->high);
> +
> + if (unlikely(!high))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (!test_bit(ZONE_RECLAIM_ACTIVE, &zone->flags))
> + return high;
> +
> + /*
> + * If reclaim is active, limit the number of pages that can be
> + * stored on pcp lists
> + */
> + return READ_ONCE(pcp->batch) << 2;
> +}
Should there be a sanity check on this? Let's say we had one of those
weirdo zones with tons of CPUs and a small low_wmark_pages(). Could we
have a case where:
pcp->high < pcp->batch<<2
and this effectively *raises* nr_pcp_high()?
It's not possible with the current pcp->high calculation, but does
anything prevent it now?
