On Fri, 21 May 2021 10:32:09 +0200 Marco Elver wrote: >Since wait_event() uses TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE by default, waiting for an >allocation counts towards load. However, for KFENCE, this does not make >any sense, since there is no busy work we're awaiting. Because of a blocking wq callback, kfence_timer should be queued on a unbound workqueue in the first place. Feel free to add a followup to replace system_power_efficient_wq with system_unbound_wq if it makes sense to you that kfence behaves as correctly as expected independent of CONFIG_WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT_DEFAULT given "system_power_efficient_wq is identical to system_wq if 'wq_power_efficient' is disabled."
