On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:12 PM, David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, David Rientjes wrote: > >> Ok, so __GFP_NORETRY it is. Just make sure that when >> pm_restrict_gfp_mask() masks off __GFP_IO and __GFP_FS that it also sets >> __GFP_NORETRY even though the name of the function no longer seems >> appropriate anymore. >> > > Or, rather, when pm_restrict_gfp_mask() clears __GFP_IO and __GFP_FS that > it also has the same behavior as __GFP_NORETRY in should_alloc_retry() by > setting a variable in file scope. > Why do you prefer that over adding a gfp_required_mask? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href