On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 05:39:14PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> No problem on 64-bit without huge pages, but xfstests generic/285
> and other SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA tests have regressed on huge tmpfs,
> and on 32-bit architectures, with the new mapping_seek_hole_data().
> Several different bugs turned out to need fixing.
>
> u64 casts added to stop unfortunate sign-extension when shifting
> (and let's use shifts throughout, rather than mixed with * and /).
That confuses me. loff_t is a signed long long, but it can't be negative
(... right?) So how does casting it to an u64 before dividing by
PAGE_SIZE help?
> Use round_up() when advancing pos, to stop assuming that pos was
> already THP-aligned when advancing it by THP-size. (But I believe
> this use of round_up() assumes that any THP must be THP-aligned:
> true while tmpfs enforces that alignment, and is the only fs with
> FS_THP_SUPPORT; but might need to be generalized in the future?
> If I try to generalize it right now, I'm sure to get it wrong!)
No generalisation needed in future. Folios must be naturally aligned
within a file.
> @@ -2681,7 +2681,8 @@ loff_t mapping_seek_hole_data(struct add
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> while ((page = find_get_entry(&xas, max, XA_PRESENT))) {
> - loff_t pos = xas.xa_index * PAGE_SIZE;
> + loff_t pos = (u64)xas.xa_index << PAGE_SHIFT;
> + unsigned int seek_size;
I've been preferring size_t for 'number of bytes in a page' because
I'm sure somebody is going to want a page larger than 2GB in the next
ten years.
