Hi Christophe,
> Pagewalk ignores hugepd entries and walk down the tables
> as if it was traditionnal entries, leading to crazy result.
>
> Add walk_hugepd_range() and use it to walk hugepage tables.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/pagewalk.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/pagewalk.c b/mm/pagewalk.c
> index e81640d9f177..410a9d8f7572 100644
> --- a/mm/pagewalk.c
> +++ b/mm/pagewalk.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,32 @@ static int walk_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> return err;
> }
>
> +static int walk_hugepd_range(hugepd_t *phpd, unsigned long addr,
> + unsigned long end, struct mm_walk *walk, int pdshift)
> +{
> + int err = 0;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_HUGEPD
> + const struct mm_walk_ops *ops = walk->ops;
> + int shift = hugepd_shift(*phpd);
> + int page_size = 1 << shift;
> +
> + if (addr & (page_size - 1))
> + return 0;
> +
> + for (;;) {
> + pte_t *pte = hugepte_offset(*phpd, addr, pdshift);
> +
> + err = ops->pte_entry(pte, addr, addr + page_size, walk);
> + if (err)
> + break;
> + if (addr >= end - page_size)
> + break;
> + addr += page_size;
> + }
Initially I thought this was a somewhat unintuitive way to structure
this loop, but I see it parallels the structure of walk_pte_range_inner,
so I think the consistency is worth it.
I notice the pte walking code potentially takes some locks: does this
code need to do that?
arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c says that hugepds are protected by the
mm->page_table_lock, but I don't think we're taking it in this code.
> +#endif
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> static int walk_pmd_range(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> struct mm_walk *walk)
> {
> @@ -108,7 +134,10 @@ static int walk_pmd_range(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> goto again;
> }
>
> - err = walk_pte_range(pmd, addr, next, walk);
> + if (is_hugepd(__hugepd(pmd_val(*pmd))))
> + err = walk_hugepd_range((hugepd_t *)pmd, addr, next, walk, PMD_SHIFT);
> + else
> + err = walk_pte_range(pmd, addr, next, walk);
> if (err)
> break;
> } while (pmd++, addr = next, addr != end);
> @@ -157,7 +186,10 @@ static int walk_pud_range(p4d_t *p4d, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> if (pud_none(*pud))
> goto again;
>
> - err = walk_pmd_range(pud, addr, next, walk);
> + if (is_hugepd(__hugepd(pud_val(*pud))))
> + err = walk_hugepd_range((hugepd_t *)pud, addr, next, walk, PUD_SHIFT);
> + else
> + err = walk_pmd_range(pud, addr, next, walk);
I'm a bit worried you might end up calling into walk_hugepd_range with
ops->pte_entry == NULL, and then jumping to 0.
static int walk_pud_range(p4d_t *p4d, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
struct mm_walk *walk)
{
...
pud = pud_offset(p4d, addr);
do {
...
if ((!walk->vma && (pud_leaf(*pud) || !pud_present(*pud))) ||
walk->action == ACTION_CONTINUE ||
!(ops->pmd_entry || ops->pte_entry)) <<< THIS CHECK
continue;
...
if (is_hugepd(__hugepd(pud_val(*pud))))
err = walk_hugepd_range((hugepd_t *)pud, addr, next, walk, PUD_SHIFT);
else
err = walk_pmd_range(pud, addr, next, walk);
if (err)
break;
} while (pud++, addr = next, addr != end);
walk_pud_range will proceed if there is _either_ an ops->pmd_entry _or_
an ops->pte_entry, but walk_hugepd_range will call ops->pte_entry
unconditionally.
The same issue applies to walk_{p4d,pgd}_range...
Kind regards,
Daniel
