On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:23:55 +0200 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > + * is done. STRICT_MODULE_RWX may require extra work to support this > > + * too. > > + */ > > > > - return __vmalloc_node_range(size, 1, MODULES_VADDR, MODULES_END, GFP_KERNEL, > > - PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC, VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS, NUMA_NO_NODE, > > > I think you should add the following in <asm/pgtable.h> > > #ifndef MODULES_VADDR > #define MODULES_VADDR VMALLOC_START > #define MODULES_END VMALLOC_END > #endif > > And leave module_alloc() as is (just removing the enclosing #ifdef MODULES_VADDR and adding the > VM_NO_HUGE_VMAP flag) > > This would minimise the conflits with the changes I did in powerpc/next reported by Stephen R. > I'll drop powerpc-64s-radix-enable-huge-vmalloc-mappings.patch for now, make life simpler. Nick, a redo on top of Christophe's changes in linux-next would be best please.
