From: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:09:34 +0400 > This series was extensively reviewed over the past month, and after > all major comments were merged, I feel it is ready for inclusion when > the next merge window opens. Minor fixes will be provided if they > prove to be necessary. I'm not applying this. You're turning inline increments and decrements of the existing memory limits into indirect function calls. That imposes a new non-trivial cost, in fast paths, even when people do not use your feature. Make this evaluate into exactly the same exact code stream we have now when the memory cgroup feature is not in use, which will be the majority of users. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>