Yang Shi <shy828301@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > The generic migration path will check refcount, so no need check refcount here. > But the old code actually prevents from migrating shared THP (mapped by multiple > processes), so bail out early if mapcount is > 1 to keep the behavior. What prevents us from migrating shared THP? If no, why not just remove the old refcount checking? Best Regards, Huang, Ying > Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > mm/migrate.c | 16 ++++------------ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c > index a72994c68ec6..dc7cc7f3a124 100644 > --- a/mm/migrate.c > +++ b/mm/migrate.c > @@ -2067,6 +2067,10 @@ static int numamigrate_isolate_page(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct page *page) > > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(compound_order(page) && !PageTransHuge(page), page); > > + /* Do not migrate THP mapped by multiple processes */ > + if (PageTransHuge(page) && page_mapcount(page) > 1) > + return 0; > + > /* Avoid migrating to a node that is nearly full */ > if (!migrate_balanced_pgdat(pgdat, compound_nr(page))) > return 0; > @@ -2074,18 +2078,6 @@ static int numamigrate_isolate_page(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct page *page) > if (isolate_lru_page(page)) > return 0; > > - /* > - * migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page() skips page migration's usual > - * check on page_count(), so we must do it here, now that the page > - * has been isolated: a GUP pin, or any other pin, prevents migration. > - * The expected page count is 3: 1 for page's mapcount and 1 for the > - * caller's pin and 1 for the reference taken by isolate_lru_page(). > - */ > - if (PageTransHuge(page) && page_count(page) != 3) { > - putback_lru_page(page); > - return 0; > - } > - > page_lru = page_is_file_lru(page); > mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(page), NR_ISOLATED_ANON + page_lru, > thp_nr_pages(page));