On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, Hans Schillstrom wrote: > Hello, > I got this when I was testing a VLAN patch i.e. using Dave Millers net-next from today. > When doing this on a single core i686 I got the warning every time, > however ifenslave is not hanging it's just a warning > Have not been testing this on a multicore jet. > > There is no warnings with a 3.0.4 kernel. > > Is this a known warning ? > > ~ # ifenslave bond0 eth1 eth2 > > ============================================= > [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] > 3.1.0-rc9+ #3 > --------------------------------------------- > ifenslave/749 is trying to acquire lock: > (&(&parent->list_lock)->rlock){-.-...}, at: [<c14234a0>] cache_flusharray+0x41/0xdb > > but task is already holding lock: > (&(&parent->list_lock)->rlock){-.-...}, at: [<c14234a0>] cache_flusharray+0x41/0xdb > Hmm, the only candidate that I can see that may have caused this is 83835b3d9aec ("slab, lockdep: Annotate slab -> rcu -> debug_object -> slab"). Could you try reverting that patch in your local tree and seeing if it helps? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>