On 2021/4/9 13:04, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 11:17:49 +0800 Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On 2021/4/9 7:25, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>>> On 4/2/21 2:32 AM, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>>>> A rare out of memory error would prevent removal of the reserve map region
>>>> for a page. hugetlb_fix_reserve_counts() handles this rare case to avoid
>>>> dangling with incorrect counts. Unfortunately, hugepage_subpool_get_pages
>>>> and hugetlb_acct_memory could possibly fail too. We should correctly handle
>>>> these cases.
>>>
>>> Yes, this is a potential issue.
>>>
>>> The 'good news' is that hugetlb_fix_reserve_counts() is unlikely to ever
>>> be called. To do so would imply we could not allocate a region entry
>>> which is only 6 words in size. We also keep a 'cache' of entries so we
>>> may not even need to allocate.
>>>
>>> But, as mentioned it is a potential issue.
>>
>> Yes, a potential *theoretical* issue.
>>
>>>
>>>> Fixes: b5cec28d36f5 ("hugetlbfs: truncate_hugepages() takes a range of pages")
>>>
>>> This is likely going to make this get picked by by stable releases.
>>> That is unfortunate as mentioned above this is mostly theoretical.
>>>
>>
>> I will drop this. This does not worth backport.
>>
>
> -stable have been asked not to backport MM patches unless MM patches
> include "cc:stable". ie, no making our backporting decisions for us,
> please.
>
Sorry about it! I would retain the Fixes tag.
Many thanks for pointing this out.
> .
>
