On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 20:22 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 07:55:37PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > Standardize the style for compiler based printf format verification. > > Standardized the location of __printf too. > > Done via script and a little typing. > > $ grep -rPl --include=*.[ch] -w "__attribute__" * | \ > > grep -vP "^(tools|scripts|include/linux/compiler-gcc.h)" | \ > > xargs perl -n -i -e 'local $/; while (<>) { s/\b__attribute__\s*\(\s*\(\s*format\s*\(\s*printf\s*,\s*(.+)\s*,\s*(.+)\s*\)\s*\)\s*\)/__printf($1, $2)/g ; print; }' > > Completely untested... > This patch breaks ARCH=um (linux-next-20111011): Hi Kirill, thanks for reporting this. I think it breaks almost all the the arches with modifications. > In file included from /home/kas/git/public/linux-next/arch/um/os-Linux/aio.c:17:0: > /home/kas/git/public/linux-next/arch/um/include/shared/user.h:26:17: error: expected declaration specifiers or ‘...’ before numeric constant Hey Andrew, I think _all_ of the arch/... changes except arch/frv and arch/s390 should be reverted. Andrew, I don't know if you saw this: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/28/324 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>