Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 6 (arch/x86/mm/init_64.c)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 09:57:03PM +0200, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 11:39:47AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>  
> > > Looks like that compound "if" is too much for gcc 7.5.0 to handle:
> > > 
> > > 			} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) &&
> > > 				   vmemmap_pmd_is_unused(addr, next)) {
> > > 					free_hugepage_table(pmd_page(*pmd),
> > > 							    altmap);
> > > 					spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> > > 					pmd_clear(pmd);
> > > 					spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> > > 			}
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > This is what I am using for now:
> 
> Hi Randy
> 
> Yeah, that is what v4 was using [1].
> We decided to get rid of the ifdef for costimetic reasons but it seems
> it does not do the trick.
> 
> I will ask Andrew to squash that on top.

This is pretty ugly.  What I was doing was this:

+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
@@ -862,6 +862,9 @@ static bool __meminit vmemmap_pmd_is_unused(unsigned long addr, unsigned long en
 
        return !memchr_inv((void *)start, PAGE_UNUSED, PMD_SIZE);
 }
+#else
+static inline bool vmemmap_pmd_is_unused(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
+{ return false; }
 #endif
 
 static void __meminit __vmemmap_use_sub_pmd(unsigned long start)
@@ -924,6 +927,9 @@ static void __meminit vmemmap_use_new_sub_pmd(unsigned long start, unsigned long
        if (!IS_ALIGNED(end, PMD_SIZE))
                unused_pmd_start = end;
 }
+#else
+static inline bool vmemmap_pmd_is_unused(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
+{ return false; }
 #endif
 
 /*

(whitespace damaged, but ...)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux