Hi Alexey, Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on linux/master] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v5.12-rc6 next-20210401] [cannot apply to hnaz-linux-mm/master] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Alexey-Avramov/mm-vmscan-add-sysctl-knobs-for-protecting-the-specified/20210406-061034 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 5e46d1b78a03d52306f21f77a4e4a144b6d31486 config: s390-randconfig-r006-20210405 (attached as .config) compiler: clang version 13.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project a46f59a747a7273cc439efaf3b4f98d8b63d2f20) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # install s390 cross compiling tool for clang build # apt-get install binutils-s390x-linux-gnu # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/a5eeb8d197a8e10c333422e9cc0f2c7d976a3426 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Alexey-Avramov/mm-vmscan-add-sysctl-knobs-for-protecting-the-specified/20210406-061034 git checkout a5eeb8d197a8e10c333422e9cc0f2c7d976a3426 # save the attached .config to linux build tree COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=s390 If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from mm/vmscan.c:20: In file included from include/linux/swap.h:9: In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:22: In file included from include/linux/writeback.h:14: In file included from include/linux/blk-cgroup.h:23: In file included from include/linux/blkdev.h:26: In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80: include/asm-generic/io.h:464:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:477:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:36:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu' #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x)) ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16' #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x)) ^ In file included from mm/vmscan.c:20: In file included from include/linux/swap.h:9: In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:22: In file included from include/linux/writeback.h:14: In file included from include/linux/blk-cgroup.h:23: In file included from include/linux/blkdev.h:26: In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80: include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu' #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x)) ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32' #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x)) ^ In file included from mm/vmscan.c:20: In file included from include/linux/swap.h:9: In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:22: In file included from include/linux/writeback.h:14: In file included from include/linux/blk-cgroup.h:23: In file included from include/linux/blkdev.h:26: In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80: include/asm-generic/io.h:501:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:511:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:521:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:609:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:617:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:625:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:634:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:643:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:652:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ >> mm/vmscan.c:2819:7: warning: variable 'clean' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized] if (reclaimable_file > dirty) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/vmscan.c:2822:25: note: uninitialized use occurs here sc->clean_below_low = clean < sysctl_clean_low_kbytes; ^~~~~ mm/vmscan.c:2819:3: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always true if (reclaimable_file > dirty) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/vmscan.c:2812:47: note: initialize the variable 'clean' to silence this warning unsigned long reclaimable_file, dirty, clean; ^ = 0 13 warnings generated. vim +2819 mm/vmscan.c 2706 2707 static void shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc) 2708 { 2709 struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state; 2710 unsigned long nr_reclaimed, nr_scanned; 2711 struct lruvec *target_lruvec; 2712 bool reclaimable = false; 2713 unsigned long file; 2714 2715 target_lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(sc->target_mem_cgroup, pgdat); 2716 2717 again: 2718 memset(&sc->nr, 0, sizeof(sc->nr)); 2719 2720 nr_reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed; 2721 nr_scanned = sc->nr_scanned; 2722 2723 /* 2724 * Determine the scan balance between anon and file LRUs. 2725 */ 2726 spin_lock_irq(&target_lruvec->lru_lock); 2727 sc->anon_cost = target_lruvec->anon_cost; 2728 sc->file_cost = target_lruvec->file_cost; 2729 spin_unlock_irq(&target_lruvec->lru_lock); 2730 2731 /* 2732 * Target desirable inactive:active list ratios for the anon 2733 * and file LRU lists. 2734 */ 2735 if (!sc->force_deactivate) { 2736 unsigned long refaults; 2737 2738 refaults = lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec, 2739 WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_ANON); 2740 if (refaults != target_lruvec->refaults[0] || 2741 inactive_is_low(target_lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON)) 2742 sc->may_deactivate |= DEACTIVATE_ANON; 2743 else 2744 sc->may_deactivate &= ~DEACTIVATE_ANON; 2745 2746 /* 2747 * When refaults are being observed, it means a new 2748 * workingset is being established. Deactivate to get 2749 * rid of any stale active pages quickly. 2750 */ 2751 refaults = lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec, 2752 WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_FILE); 2753 if (refaults != target_lruvec->refaults[1] || 2754 inactive_is_low(target_lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE)) 2755 sc->may_deactivate |= DEACTIVATE_FILE; 2756 else 2757 sc->may_deactivate &= ~DEACTIVATE_FILE; 2758 } else 2759 sc->may_deactivate = DEACTIVATE_ANON | DEACTIVATE_FILE; 2760 2761 /* 2762 * If we have plenty of inactive file pages that aren't 2763 * thrashing, try to reclaim those first before touching 2764 * anonymous pages. 2765 */ 2766 file = lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec, NR_INACTIVE_FILE); 2767 if (file >> sc->priority && !(sc->may_deactivate & DEACTIVATE_FILE)) 2768 sc->cache_trim_mode = 1; 2769 else 2770 sc->cache_trim_mode = 0; 2771 2772 /* 2773 * Prevent the reclaimer from falling into the cache trap: as 2774 * cache pages start out inactive, every cache fault will tip 2775 * the scan balance towards the file LRU. And as the file LRU 2776 * shrinks, so does the window for rotation from references. 2777 * This means we have a runaway feedback loop where a tiny 2778 * thrashing file LRU becomes infinitely more attractive than 2779 * anon pages. Try to detect this based on file LRU size. 2780 */ 2781 if (!cgroup_reclaim(sc)) { 2782 unsigned long total_high_wmark = 0; 2783 unsigned long free, anon; 2784 int z; 2785 2786 free = sum_zone_node_page_state(pgdat->node_id, NR_FREE_PAGES); 2787 file = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_ACTIVE_FILE) + 2788 node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_FILE); 2789 2790 for (z = 0; z < MAX_NR_ZONES; z++) { 2791 struct zone *zone = &pgdat->node_zones[z]; 2792 if (!managed_zone(zone)) 2793 continue; 2794 2795 total_high_wmark += high_wmark_pages(zone); 2796 } 2797 2798 /* 2799 * Consider anon: if that's low too, this isn't a 2800 * runaway file reclaim problem, but rather just 2801 * extreme pressure. Reclaim as per usual then. 2802 */ 2803 anon = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_ANON); 2804 2805 sc->file_is_tiny = 2806 file + free <= total_high_wmark && 2807 !(sc->may_deactivate & DEACTIVATE_ANON) && 2808 anon >> sc->priority; 2809 } 2810 2811 if (sysctl_clean_low_kbytes || sysctl_clean_min_kbytes) { 2812 unsigned long reclaimable_file, dirty, clean; 2813 2814 reclaimable_file = 2815 node_page_state(pgdat, NR_ACTIVE_FILE) + 2816 node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_FILE) + 2817 node_page_state(pgdat, NR_ISOLATED_FILE); 2818 dirty = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_FILE_DIRTY); > 2819 if (reclaimable_file > dirty) 2820 clean = (reclaimable_file - dirty) << (PAGE_SHIFT - 10); 2821 2822 sc->clean_below_low = clean < sysctl_clean_low_kbytes; 2823 sc->clean_below_min = clean < sysctl_clean_min_kbytes; 2824 } else { 2825 sc->clean_below_low = false; 2826 sc->clean_below_min = false; 2827 } 2828 2829 shrink_node_memcgs(pgdat, sc); 2830 2831 if (reclaim_state) { 2832 sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab; 2833 reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab = 0; 2834 } 2835 2836 /* Record the subtree's reclaim efficiency */ 2837 vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, sc->target_mem_cgroup, true, 2838 sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned, 2839 sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed); 2840 2841 if (sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed) 2842 reclaimable = true; 2843 2844 if (current_is_kswapd()) { 2845 /* 2846 * If reclaim is isolating dirty pages under writeback, 2847 * it implies that the long-lived page allocation rate 2848 * is exceeding the page laundering rate. Either the 2849 * global limits are not being effective at throttling 2850 * processes due to the page distribution throughout 2851 * zones or there is heavy usage of a slow backing 2852 * device. The only option is to throttle from reclaim 2853 * context which is not ideal as there is no guarantee 2854 * the dirtying process is throttled in the same way 2855 * balance_dirty_pages() manages. 2856 * 2857 * Once a node is flagged PGDAT_WRITEBACK, kswapd will 2858 * count the number of pages under pages flagged for 2859 * immediate reclaim and stall if any are encountered 2860 * in the nr_immediate check below. 2861 */ 2862 if (sc->nr.writeback && sc->nr.writeback == sc->nr.taken) 2863 set_bit(PGDAT_WRITEBACK, &pgdat->flags); 2864 2865 /* Allow kswapd to start writing pages during reclaim.*/ 2866 if (sc->nr.unqueued_dirty == sc->nr.file_taken) 2867 set_bit(PGDAT_DIRTY, &pgdat->flags); 2868 2869 /* 2870 * If kswapd scans pages marked for immediate 2871 * reclaim and under writeback (nr_immediate), it 2872 * implies that pages are cycling through the LRU 2873 * faster than they are written so also forcibly stall. 2874 */ 2875 if (sc->nr.immediate) 2876 congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10); 2877 } 2878 2879 /* 2880 * Tag a node/memcg as congested if all the dirty pages 2881 * scanned were backed by a congested BDI and 2882 * wait_iff_congested will stall. 2883 * 2884 * Legacy memcg will stall in page writeback so avoid forcibly 2885 * stalling in wait_iff_congested(). 2886 */ 2887 if ((current_is_kswapd() || 2888 (cgroup_reclaim(sc) && writeback_throttling_sane(sc))) && 2889 sc->nr.dirty && sc->nr.dirty == sc->nr.congested) 2890 set_bit(LRUVEC_CONGESTED, &target_lruvec->flags); 2891 2892 /* 2893 * Stall direct reclaim for IO completions if underlying BDIs 2894 * and node is congested. Allow kswapd to continue until it 2895 * starts encountering unqueued dirty pages or cycling through 2896 * the LRU too quickly. 2897 */ 2898 if (!current_is_kswapd() && current_may_throttle() && 2899 !sc->hibernation_mode && 2900 test_bit(LRUVEC_CONGESTED, &target_lruvec->flags)) 2901 wait_iff_congested(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10); 2902 2903 if (should_continue_reclaim(pgdat, sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed, 2904 sc)) 2905 goto again; 2906 2907 /* 2908 * Kswapd gives up on balancing particular nodes after too 2909 * many failures to reclaim anything from them and goes to 2910 * sleep. On reclaim progress, reset the failure counter. A 2911 * successful direct reclaim run will revive a dormant kswapd. 2912 */ 2913 if (reclaimable) 2914 pgdat->kswapd_failures = 0; 2915 } 2916 --- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
.config.gz
Description: application/gzip
